The phrase "by the data subject" is correct and can be used in written English.
This phrase is typically used to refer to an individual's rights with regards to the use of their personal data. For example: "Organizations must respect the rights granted to the data subject by the General Data Protection Regulation."
Because the Court's decision specifically said that a relevant factor should be "the role played by the data subject in public life," Google is reluctant to exclude links about politicians and other prominent people.
Although, as a Lords select committee has just pointed out in an admirable demolition of the judgment: "It is wrong in principle to leave to search engines the task of deciding many thousands of individual cases against criteria as vague as 'particular reasons, such as the role played by the data subject in public life'".
And there is an important exception if "for particular reasons, such as the role played by the data subject in public life … the interference with his fundamental rights is justified by the preponderant interest of the general public in having … access to the information in question".
After all, the court specified that the right to be forgotten didn't apply "if it appeared, for particular reasons, such as the role played by the data subject in public life, that the interference with his fundamental rights is justified by the preponderant interest of the general public".
"However" - and it's a big, big however - "that would not be the case if it appeared, for particular reasons, such as the role played by the data subject in public life, that the interference with his fundamental rights is justified by the preponderant interest of the general public in having, on account of inclusion in the list of results, access to the information in question".
Right of access by the data subject.
These third parties may be constituted by members of the data subject's genetic line or collateral relatives or members of his/her social family.
It explains that certain categories of information must be provided to the data subject by the biobank (section 4), and that this information must be of a certain specificity (section 5).
Selection of the statistical methods used in the presented study was conditioned by the scope of data subjected to the analysis.
Any issues associated with potential loss of validity were addressed by grouping the data for subjects with a TF score or 4 or higher.
For a duty to create, the actions required by data subjects to generate new data for DE should be negligible (the threshold for 'negligible' will vary between contexts).
