Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Fig. 5 Scatter plot of the experimental pLD50 values versus the predicted values for the molecules in the (a) training and (b) test sets given by the consensus model without the MPLE predictions in Table 5.
The scatter plot of the experimental pLD50 values versus the predicted values given by the consensus model without the MPLE predictions (Table 5) for the training and test sets was shown in Fig. 5.
The hit may extend through an arbitrary number of model states, matching 5′ and 3′ residues as described by the consensus model.
Similar(57)
The final model was created by refining the consensus model with molecular dynamics simulations.
The 20 molecules in the test set with the largest prediction errors by using the consensus model in Table 5 were shown in Table 6.
The consensus model by integrating the outputs from multiple individual models demonstrated better predictivity ((q_{ext}^{2}) = 0.669 0.689) than any individual model for the test set.
In the case of the majority model, jurisdictional control will be by parliamentary sovereignty, whereas for the consensus model it will pass through a constitutional court of a federal nature.
But the STeLLA model also advances and deepens our understandings of effective PD by digging beneath the surface of the consensus model to articulate design principles that provide more specific guidance about features of effective PD.
The consensus model includes both but clearly distinguishes between them.
In fact, some research studies challenge the consensus model.
They generate 3D structures by taking the consensus models from a variety of individual servers [ 34]. 3D structure, ligand binding sites, and cleft analyses denote that the cork domain forms a pair pocket within BauA barrel.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com