Sentence examples for by the classification method from inspiring English sources
Accuracy accuracy is a measure of the percent of correctly classified objects by the classification method: begin{aligned} hbox {Accuracy} =frac{mathrm{TP}+mathrm{TN}}{mathrm{TP}+mathrm{FP}+mathrm{TN}+mathrm{FN}}.
end{aligned}Error rate the percentage of incorrectly classified object by the classification method: begin{aligned} hbox {Error Rate}=frac{mathrm{FP}+mathrm{FN}}{mathrm{TP}+mathrm{FP}+mathrm{TN}+mathrm{FN}}.
To isolate genes with heterogeneous expression patterns in RPCs, the 42 RPCs identified by the classification method described in this study were compared both among themselves and to the developing RGC, AC and PR cells [36].
Nurses' assessment of harm and AEs varied by the classification method used, and also differed from physicians' assessment.
However, at the group level, the region identified by the classification method was largely congruent with the region that exhibited high myelination in the study by Dick et al. (2012).
They were asked to wear or remove accelerometers at intervals lasting at least 15 min. Participants synchronised the clocks they used with the clocks in the accelerometers before wearing them, and kept diaries of the exact timings of accelerometer wear and removal, which were compared with the predictions derived by the classification method for performance evaluation.
According to the classification method by Clermont et al. [12], later modified by Escobar-Páramo Escobar-Páramotion of subgroups [13], seten isolales belonged to phylogenetic group A0, five to group D, one to group B1, two to group B2, and one to group A (Table 3).
The classification method proposed by Golub et al (1999) finds genes that show large and consistent expression differences between two groups of samples (see Materials and Methods).
Based on NGS contigs, the classification method proposed by Nakano provided inconsistent results due to errors and the accuracy rate of contig sequences.
The thoracic pedicles studied were then reclassified into four types based on the classification method proposed by Lenke et al. [ 6].
