Two groups of aligned sequences were statistically analyzed by the binomial test (p < 0.01) against a binomial distribution.
Instances where these proportions differ from chance (p =.50) by the binomial test are marked with an asterisk.
* P-values are obtained by the binomial test; only P-values that fulfilled an additional false discovery rate test are shown.
The differentially methylated signal sites were counted and tested for over- or under-representation in the differentially expressed genes (Fig. 5A and D) by the binomial test with an occurrence probability of 5%.
The one-tailed p-value for this fraction by the binomial test is 4.00E-7 4.00E-7n the assumption that only 1/4 of motif pairs would based this onientheion if they were rassumptionsthatuted.
In L1 addition, 9 of 11 subjects (81.8%) showed higher behavioral performance in Chinese approximate addition (CA) than Chinese exact addition (CE), which is significantly different from the 50% chance level as revealed by the binomial test (P = 0.033).
Welch et al. identified significant extra variability (beyond that expected by the binomial test) in the number of peaks assigned to genes in ENCODE ChIP-seq data; they show this, together with the incorrect assumption of the binomial test with respect to locus length, accounts for the inflated type I error (Welch et al., 2014).
Although the O/E motif is significantly enriched according to both tests, the observed TATA-box enrichment is significant only when compared to shuffled sequences (p < 0.0001) and not by the binomial test comparing the 200-bp promoters to the preceding 200-bp regions (Table 1).
Except for F3's performance in the Large-food condition (83.33%), performance for the Large-food condition (33.33% (M1), 39.58% (F1), and 45.83% (F2)) and the Gap/Large-food condition (12.5% (M1), 8.33% (F1), 8.33% (F2), and 4.17% (F3)) was poor; these success rates were not significant by the binomial test, as shown in Table 2.
We tested whether significantly more subjects turned their head to one side than expected by chance, using the Binomial test (e.g. [13], [27]).
