Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
Cam malformations were assessed by the alpha angle, as described by Nötzli et al. (2002).
In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that the femoral head neck contour, characterised by the alpha angle, does vary as a function of physeal maturation, but only in males.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the femoral head neck contour, characterised by the alpha angle, varies with the stage of physeal maturation using MRI evaluation of an asymptomatic paediatric population.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the femoral head neck contour, characterised by the alpha angle, correlates with the stage of physeal maturation using MRI evaluation of an asymptomatic paediatric population.
Similar(56)
Cam morphology impingement is then identified by measuring the alpha angle on the Dunn view X-ray.
Most patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) have a cam deformity, which may be quantified by measuring the alpha angle and anterior offset ratio (AOR).
The presence of a cam deformity was assessed on the lateral radiographs by measuring the alpha angle (Notzli et al. 2002, Clohisy et al. 2008) and anterior offset ratio (Eijer et al. 2001, Clohisy et al. 2008).
This may be recognized by radiography (Clohisy et al. 2008), CT (Beaule et al. 2005), and MRI (Notzli et al. 2002), and quantified by measuring the alpha angle (Notzli et al. 2002) and anterior offset ratio (Eijer et al. 2001).
In 15 of 17 affected hips (88%, CI: 65 100) evaluated by MRI at follow-up, the alpha angle of Nötzli et al. was > 55°, representing a pathological angle indicative of cam-type deformity.
When NaCl or albumin was used in the presence of combined acidosis and hypothermia, the alpha angle was normalized by rFVIIa.
The most used concavity measure is the alpha angle, described initially by Nötzli et al. (2002) to diagnose cam deformity and increasingly used in cohort studies examining the risk of OA development (Johnston et al. 2008, Nicholls et al. 2011, Agricola et al. 2013).
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com