Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
We held that through the Fourteenth Amendment, federal power extended to intrude upon the province of the Eleventh Amendment and therefore that § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment allowed Congress to abrogate the immunity from suit guaranteed by that Amendment.
The court then would decide whether that reason is sufficient to overcome prosecution history estoppel as a bar to application of the doctrine of equivalents to the element added by that amendment.
The inhibition by that amendment is not the less valuable and effective because of the prior and existing inhibition against such action in the constitutions of the several states.
But by focusing on legitimate expectations of privacy in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, the Court has not altogether abandoned use of property concepts in determining the presence or absence of the privacy interests protected by that Amendment.
The opinion in Wilson v. North Carolina shows a deliberate consideration of the scope of the 14th Amendment, and a refusal to hold, as is now held, that a contest about a state office could not, under any circumstances, involve rights secured by that Amendment.
But the penological policy of a State is not to be tested by the scope of the Eighth Amendment, and is not involved in the controversy which is necessarily evoked by that Amendment as to the historic meaning of "cruel and unusual punishment". See Weems v. United States, 217 U.S. 349, and particularly the dissenting opinion of White and Holmes, JJ.
Similar(52)
For Determination by President that amendment by Pub.
832, provided in part that amendment by section 111(b) of Pub.
832, provided in part that amendment by section 111(a) of Pub.
But his "yea" vote simply meant that amendment lost by a margin of 17to1919 rather than the 16 to 20 score recorded by the other dozen failed amendments.
The governor wants that amendment passed by the end of the spring legislative session.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com