Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Post hoc testing (contrast) was conducted only when preceded by significant analysis of variance effects.
Similar(59)
The Robust Multi-Array Average (RMA) algorithm was used and data was also analyzed by the significant analysis of microarray methods (SAM).
Seasonal differences in OTU patterns as well as potential correlations between respiratory viruses and OTU patterns were studied by the Significant Analysis of Microarrays (SAM analysis) - a non-parametric statistical technique for finding significant differences between microarray data of groups based on experimental conditions [29], implemented in the MeV software package [28].
After Between-array normalization and signal filtration (IsGeneDetected, WellAboveNeg) performed by RMA algorithm [ 28], the data was analyzed by T-test and Significant Analysis of Microarray analyses SAM) [ 29] to identify differentially expressed miRNAs.
The statistical significance of the gene expression changes observed was assessed by using the significant analysis of microarrays (SAM) program [ 31].
Genes such as, PCNA, CKS1B, TPX2, UBE2C, CDC6, confirmed by the statistically significant analysis of microarray data, SAM, were among the positive proliferation genes differentially expressed by immortal cell lines, and matched tumor tissue/cell culture samples.
The genes with a significantly differential expression among 6 organs for at least one organ-pair were identified by a software package, SAM, (Significant Analysis of Microarray, ) [ 11].
Relative quantification [ 60] of miRNA expression levels derived from profiling experiments was tested for significant differences by applying significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) [ 61] which uses permutation.
Proceeding our study by significant parameters, analysis of variance (ANOVA) displayed a high coefficient of determination (R2) value of 0.931 0.959, indicating the satisfactory adjustment of the quadratic model.
We obtained the 479 selected functional events (SFEs) of three data types (copy number alterations, somatic mutations, and DNA hyper-methylations) that were filtered by statistical and functional significant analysis from thousands of genomic and epigenetic changes [ 16].
As indicator for the improvement from the null model to the two-level model, we calculated McFadden's (1973) adjusted R-squared (= 1−[−2LL2-level model/−2LLnull model] = 1−[9,827.192−10,039.848]) and found an error reduction of only 2.1percentt, but which remains significant by analysis of deviance (χ2-test).
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com