Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Within this data set, six loci demonstrate greater than double the number of alleles obtained by sequence compared to the number of alleles obtained by length: D12S391, D2S1338, D21S11, D8S1179, vWA, and D3S1358.
Similar(59)
Unknown to the participants, the locations of stimuli follow a predefined sequence, and participants typically become faster at responding to the locations predicted by the sequence compared to random trials.
Of gaps smaller than 2.5 kb, 64% and 73% were closed by Sanger and PacBio sequencing, respectively, while none of the gaps larger than 2.5 kb were closed by Sanger sequencing, compared to 88% by PacBio sequencing.
A mean of 4 (ranging from 1 to 10) additional mutations per subject were detected by deep sequencing compared to standard sequencing (p<0.0001, 95%CI: 2.85 5.53).
This is approximately 1300 more than were found in the Sm454EST dataset and maybe be the result of the deeper coverage achieved by SOLiD sequencing compared to 454 sequencing.
However, this discrepancy may be due to the higher resolution in detecting genome rearrangements provided by genome sequencing compared to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).
The HSY sequences on the papaya Yh chromosome were occupied by higher repetitive sequences, compared to its X counterpart [ 2, 21].
Figure 2B shows that, in embryonic tissue, site#1 MRE-containing (i.e. DNMT3B1) isoforms are represented by more EST sequences compared to site#1 MRE-free isoforms (i.e. DNMT3B3).
The sequence similarity analysis of BVMO4 revealed that it is related to a group of Baeyer-Villiger monooxygenases which are characterized by longer amino acid sequences compared to most other BVMOs.
Viral metagenomic analysis currently is substantially less well developed than that of cellular populations, and is limited by a low proportion of viral sequences compared to cellular sequences.
B. ovis contains nine known deleted regions confirmed by sequencing as compared to B. melitensis [ 3].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com