We can examine the situation more closely by plotting the empirical cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the number of users in the cells in this region as shown in Figure 4.
Optical bandgap of the films were determined by plotting the empirical expression (nαhν 1/2 versus hν, as shown in Figure 3, where n, α, and hν stand for the index of refraction, the absorption coefficient, and the photon energy, respectively.
For a fixed τ=0. 1 and ε=0. 1, we evaluate the performance of the detector as the number of measurements K increases under the AK and AU cases respectively, by comparing the pseudo-ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves obtained by plotting the empirical FDR against 1−FNR, where FNR is the false nondiscovery rate.
The optical bandgap of the HfO2 was 5.3 eV in our work determined by plotting the empirical expression ( {left(mathrm{n}upalpha mathrm{h}upgamma right)}^{frac{1}{2}} ) versus hγ, as shown in Fig. 1(d), where n, α and hγ is the index of refraction, the absorption coefficient and the photon energy as described in Yang et al. [13].
We assessed the normality of the data by plotting the empirical quantiles of the variable against theoretical quantiles of a Gaussian distribution.
We tackle this question using microarray data from the three experiments, rice, Drosophila and Homo sapiens, analyzed previously, by plotting the empirical GR cdfs on the same graph; see Figure 8.
Psychometric functions were created for each dyad member and for the dyad (empirical or dummy) by plotting the proportion of trials in which the target was reported to be in the second interval against the contrast difference between the two intervals (i.e., the contrast level in the second interval minus the contrast level in the first interval at the target location).
The empirical phase transition curves are finally obtained by plotting the 0.5 contour of (overline {S}) using MATLAB®;function contour.
We do so by performing visual checks (by plotting the unconditional means of our outcome variables) and statistical checks (by including placebo leads in our empirical specification see Section 4.2).
In Fig. 1D we plot the empirical memory web with the detected groups as circles.
We plotted the empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) of the corrected enrichment P values for each method.
