Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

by lack of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"by lack of" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to refer to the absence of something or a deficiency of something. For example, "The failure of the project was caused by lack of planning."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Followed closely by lack of ambition.

News & Media

Independent

But by lack of attention".

Prospects are limited by lack of experience.

News & Media

The New York Times

She's stifled by lack of resources, options.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Live by isolation, die by lack of imagination.

I'm glad I was limited by lack of money.

Relief efforts have been hampered by lack of passable roadways.

These qualities may also be exacerbated by lack of sleep.

News & Media

The New York Times

Attempts at compliance, however, are hampered by lack of guidelines.

Microbial hydrogen production is currently hampered by lack of efficiency.

He was miffed, too, by lack of consultation.

News & Media

The Economist
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "by lack of", ensure the sentence clearly indicates what is lacking and what the consequence is. For example, instead of saying "The project failed by lack of," specify "The project failed by lack of adequate funding."

Common error

Avoid using "by lack of" as a vague explanation. Instead of saying "The problem was by lack of something", identify the specific deficiency. Being specific enhances clarity and provides actionable insights.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "by lack of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb or noun. It indicates the means or cause related to the absence or deficiency of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically sound and widely accepted.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

33%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "by lack of" is a versatile and grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to indicate causation stemming from the absence or deficiency of something. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is widely accepted and utilized across numerous contexts, ranging from news articles to scientific publications. Its communicative purpose is to explain outcomes by attributing them to a specific deficiency. While generally considered neutral to formal in register, it is most frequently found in "News & Media", "Science", and "Academia". For more formal alternatives, consider using phrases like "due to the absence of" or "owing to a deficiency in". Always ensure clarity and specificity when using "by lack of" to avoid vagueness and enhance the effectiveness of your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "by lack of" in a sentence?

Use "by lack of" to indicate that something is caused or influenced by the absence of something else. For example, "The experiment's results were skewed by lack of a control group."

What phrases can I use instead of "by lack of"?

You can use alternatives like "due to the absence of", "owing to a deficiency in", or "attributable to the scarcity of" depending on the context.

Is it more formal to say "due to a lack of" instead of "by lack of"?

While both phrases are grammatically correct, "due to a lack of" tends to be slightly more formal and is often preferred in academic or professional writing.

Which is correct, "by lack of evidence" or "for lack of evidence"?

Both phrases are commonly used, but "for lack of evidence" is often used when stating a reason, while "by lack of evidence" emphasizes the process that determined that something is absent or missing.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: