All previous studies, with the exception of that by Smith and colleagues [ 25], evaluated groups of patients with mixed drug protocols.
The simulation approach addressed whether co-expression patterns contribute meaningful information, by evaluating whether groups of transcripts formed using coexpression patterns are, collectively, more responsive to CR or aging than groups of transcripts that have been formed at random.
SD-standard deviation We assessed the expression of RCAS1 in cancer and in clear surgical margin derived from all examined patients with respect to the recurrence of the cancer process by evaluating a group of 19 patients who had suffered a relapse during the period of observation following surgical treatment.
A predictive value of these markers could be assessed by evaluating the group of dysplastic lesions, looking for a "cut-off" point in the quantitative expression between preneoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions.
This allows drawing inferences as meaningful differences between groups by evaluating the ranges of their 95% credible intervals (CrI, range of group means, at 0.95 certainty).
These mean differences for outcomes were then used to compare the same-day discharge and hospital stay groups by evaluating difference of means with independent samples.
After 6 weeks, we compared the stability of the recessed rectus muscle between the fibrin glue group and the control group by evaluating the displacement of the muscle.
We demonstrate that a risk assessment tool built with a specific regional data does not generalise and perform as well on other population groups, by evaluating the performance of the ADA online diabetes risk test tool (made available by American Diabetes Association), which is built using patients from the USA 24 (table 2).
Frequency of contact with AIV was estimated for each risk group by evaluating the prevalence of AIV among animals sampled opportunistically in each category.
According to a 2008 Institute for Corporate Productivity study of 305 organizations across the U.S., 36% of participants measure their business' productivity by evaluating the output of work groups, while 31% said they use output per person.
