Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(21)
The repeatability of measurements by each method was determined and compared.
In order to further compare the A50% and KF segmentation performance, the number of lesions that could be reliably segmented by each method was reported.
To control imputation quality, the respective quality-control (QC) cut-off recommended by each method was used.
Therefore a weighting scheme based on the number of loci examined by each method was employed.
Then we evaluated whether the methylation status by each method was associated with efficacy of anti‐EGFR treatment.
The number and percentage of children with DDE and teeth with DDE detected by each method was calculated.
Similar(39)
The performance of each method was assessed by comparing the fMRI results to the EEG focus.
The detail of each method was provided by each participant.
Reliability of each method was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients.
The consistency of each method was assessed by dividing the samples into two technical repeats.
The intra-day reproducibility of each method was analyzed by repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA).
More suggestions(18)
by each method benefited
by each ligand was
by each transaction was
by each side was
by each site was
by each method differed
by each lab was
by each individual was
by each parameter was
by each antibody was
by each product was
by each study was
by each set was
by each incident was
by each path was
by each person was
by each subfault was
by each model was
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com