There are no significant differences in the expression of lncRNAs between the two groups of patients divided by varied cutoff values of age.
BMI range was divided into three groups by the cutoff values of overweight (≥23 kg/m) and obesity (≥25 kg/m) based on the definition of obesity in the Asia-Pacific region.
While Figure 1A was produced on the summarization data set without cutoff values, Figure 1B was produced by using cutoff values of 4.3 from above and -4.3 from below on the summarization scores (any value in between was set to 0).
It is clear that the plot of H values of each CDS versus its corresponding log2 S/R ratio values was divided into two groups defined by the apparent cutoff values of H and the log2 ratio.
We then defined X-specific regions by checking different cutoff values of X-chromosome specificity, which establishes the enrichment in the X chromosome, with respect to the autosomes, of X chromosome sequences (Table 1).
By applying MTV-corrected cutoff values of T/N ratio (1.23), diagnostic performance could be maintained without decreasing specificity in small-sized lesions (Table 2).
By using the predefined cutoff values of the Cadmibel and OSCAR studies, we obtained a lower and a higher P 0), respectively.
Subsequently, we categorised the LNR by lower and upper cutoff values of 0.18 and 0.64, respectively, and all node-positive patients were assigned into low, intermediate, and high cLNR groups, respectively.
When the sequences were aligned using Blast and methods described previously [ 31], 3792 CDS were identified by the same EST with cutoff values of at least 100-bp long and 95% identity.
GO annotations were assigned to T. hassleriana lineage specific sequences, and other sequences shared by Cleomaceae with the Brassicaceae, Brassicales or lost in the Brassicaceae using Blast2GO® [ 23] by performing BLASTX and BLASTN with cutoff values of 1e-10.
