IPV was assessed in two ways: 1) ever experienced any violence by current partner, and 2) experienced any violence by current partner the past 12 months.
The same analyses were repeated in the Colombia and Peru data with the variable 'experienced any IPV the past 12 months by current partner' as the main predictor.
Regression analyses using the Colombia sample (Table 5) found no statistically significant effect of ever experiencing IPV by current partner in either unadjusted or adjusted models.
Table 3 shows the relationship between IPV by current partner and demographic and socioeconomic background characteristics, social isolation, and social capital measures.
For the Peru sample (Table 5), a statistically significant effect on illness signs was observed for ever experiencing IPV by current partner after adjusting for contextual and care variables.
The proportions with illness signs for Colombia and Peru were 55% and 466 %, respectively.> -wrap-foot> N.A. indicates information not available aValid percent, missing ignored In Bolivia, only experience of IPV the past 12 months by current partner was available, and 39%% reported experiencing any IPV the past 12 months.
Prevalence of lifetime reported IPV was 22.1%, with 20.5% by a previous partner and 6.7% by a current partner.
In Colombia, 46%% of the women reported ever experiencing any IPV by their current partner, and 39%% reported experiencing any IPV by their current partner the past 12 months.
An effect modification analysis was also performed in order to examine the potential combined effect of IPV exposure by a current partner and social isolation, and that of IPV by a current partner and low social trust, both with regard to poor mental health.
By contrast, National's current partners may fare badly in September.
