Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The group by condition interaction failed, however, to reach significance (F 1,19) = 3.66, P = 0.071).
Similar(59)
The position by condition interaction reached significance (F 1,99) = 4.71, p = 0.03, ηp 2 = 0.04), but no other interactions reached significance.
The "temperature by condition" interaction was not significant (F 4,14) = 1.07, p = 0.372).
SPM analysis to assess the gender by condition interaction showed that the genders differed significantly (pu<0.001).
This indicated a significant time by condition interaction (F 2,14 =5.29, p<.05).
Repeated measures ANOVA were used to assess time, condition, and time by condition interaction effects.
In the first experiment, the race-by-condition interaction was marginally significant.
This selectivity was confirmed by the significant stimulus-by-condition interaction, as reported in Table 3.
Group by emotion interaction failed significance (F[10,84] = 1.59, p = 0.12).
On a more exploratory basis, some sex differences were seen and the sex × experimental condition interaction just failed to reach significance.
SEX × CONDITION interactions just failed to reach statistical significance (0.05 < P < 0.10) but a SEX × INTERVAL (during extension) and CONDITION × INTERVAL interaction reached significance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com