Following Table 2's purpose, comparing relative difference (dividing microgravity and 1g mean differences by MRP2def) would have made data more comparable, given stark differences in means presented in Table 1.
On the basis of the Equation 3 and analysis above, we construct the similarity criterion for image resizing by comparing the relative difference of dissimilarity Δd i with the threshold θ.
This was performed by comparing the relative difference between quantitative estimates in the original and spatially transformed images using both segmentations of the Digimouse atlas, namely the original segmentation and our own segmentation.
This difference in kinetics thus complicates comparing relative potencies of these estrogens to induce luciferase activity.
The ΔΔCt method was used to compare relative fold expression differences.
Its concentration was quantified by comparing the difference in absorption relative to a standard curve.
Differences of chromosomal coverage could be determined by comparing the relative positions of markers common to both maps at the top and bottom of linkage groups.
By comparing the relative induction of AMP gene families in D. melanogaster and D. virilis, we show that significant differences in the relative induction of different peptides exist between species.
The differences between these treatments and untransfected cells are best visualized by comparing the relative proportions of each PrxIV species at 2 and 4 min following GSH addition.
We assessed differences in regulation of the nine cone opsins and one rhodopsin genes by comparing expression relative to housekeeping genes (T House ).
