Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
We propose a method to obtain the finite-difference coefficients by comparing its numerical dispersion with the exact form.
The model has been verified by comparing its numerical predictions with previous theoretical results as well as well as experimental data.
The accuracy of the proposed modeling method is verified by comparing its numerical solutions to those of a nonlinear finite element code.
The accuracy and reliability of the proposed method is verified by comparing its numerical predictions with those of other available numerical approaches.
The reliability and effectiveness of the proposed aDE are verified by comparing its numerical results with those of other algorithms in literature such as Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swam Optimization (PSO), etc.
The efficacy and the efficiency of this method are demonstrated by comparing its numerical experiment results with those of traditional matrix-based genetic algorithm and professional software package LINDO.
Similar(51)
The validity of the analytical solution is verified by comparing its predictions with numerical results from a finite element analysis.
The proposed approach is validated by comparing its predictions to existing numerical results in the ballistic (Kn→∞) and diffusive (Kn≪1) regimes.
The numerical simulation was verified by comparing its prediction results and the field measurement data.
The validity of numerical calculation is given by comparing its results with theoretical calculation.
Its validity is confirmed by comparing the numerical results of reflection and transmission coefficients for limiting cases with previous predictions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com