Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
This method tests for positive selection by comparing a null model of neutral evolution to a model of positive selection on those branches (Zhang et al., 2005).
CODEML (PAML version 4, [ 72]) was also used to detect positive selection by comparing a null model and a model that allows positive selection (M1 vs. M2 and M7 vs. M8).
The test identifies genes with particular codons showing evidence of positive selection by comparing a null model, where d N /d S is never allowed to exceed 1 (so only negative or neutral evolution is considered), to an alternative model in which some sites on the G. magnirostris lineage are allowed to have ω >1 (implying positive selection).
Similar(57)
Most of the previous binding site prediction tools have been formulated as hypothesis testing methods, where a significance value of TF binding at a specific sequence position is obtained by comparing a test statistic to a null distribution [21] [28], and possibly correcting the significance level for multiple testing.
We detected lineage-specific increases in substitution rates by comparing an alternative model M+ with a null model M0 (see previous paragraph).
We estimate the statistical significance of this value by comparing with a null distribution constructed from randomized motifs.
We determine each feature's relevance by comparing with a null model.
Statistical significance of the normalized similarity index was established by comparing against a null distribution of scalar projections generated by randomly permuting the 32 dimensions of the LFP layer profile vector 1000 times (p<0.01, two-sided).
Statistical significance of the correlation coefficient was established by comparing against a null distribution of correlation coefficients generated by randomly permuting the trial order of EEG activity 1000 times (p<0.01, two-sided).
The statistical significance of the choice probability was established by comparing against a null distribution of choice probability values generated by randomly permuting the identity of hit and miss trials 1000 times (p<0.01, two-sided).
Statistical significance of the similarity index was established by comparing against a null distribution of similarity index values generated by randomly permuting the 32 dimensions of the LFP layer profile vector 1000 times (p<0.01, two-sided).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com