Suggestions(5)
Exact(3)
Also by checking the proof of the last result, one can prove the next lemma.
However, by checking the proof of Lemma 3.3 carefully, one can find that the proof of Lemma 3.3 is not sensitive to the powers of log log n.
But by checking the proof carefully, we find that one cannot find that h ( S i ) m ( Y i ) is a nondecreasing function of S 1, S 2, …, S i under the conditions of Theorem 2.3.
Similar(57)
By checking the following proof, we can only consider the operator T_{beta, gamma}(f) (x, y)= int_{0}^{1}fbigl x-t,y-t^{m}bigr) frac{e^{-2pi i t^{-beta}}}{t^{gamma+1}fbigl x-t,y-t^{m}bigr
We start the proof by checking the uniqueness of solutions.
Start by checking the toenails.
Everyone can check the proof.
Proof of Theorem 1.3 By checking our proof in the following, we can assume Γ ( t ) = ( t p 1, t p 2, …, t p n ) and consider the operator T n, α, β ∗ = ∫ 0 1 f ( x − Γ ( t ) ) e − 2 π i t − β t 1 + α d t.
We had checked and double checked the hurricane-proof windows were locked top and bottom.
These results have been checked using the proof assistant Isabelle.
You have followed every step and checked it; the proof was right.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com