Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
These entities along with their FP and FN counts are shown in Tables 3 and 4. Mistakes made frequently by both tools are in italic font.
Regulators that were identified by both tools are highlighted in bold.
Similar(58)
For each intoxication time DEG reported by both tools were recovered by a custom R script.
Only putative binding sites predicted by both tools were retained for subsequent analysis.
The direction (gain/loss) reported by both tools was the same for all of the overlapping variants.
If only positives predicted by both tools were used, the specificity was slightly increased and the MCC value remains unchanged (0.53) compared with WoLF PSORT prediction.
Interestingly, the only motif detected by both tools was A AAACAAA, a cis-element that was previously detected in the promoters of genes whose expression is induced anaerobically [ 59].
Both tools were developed by experts with the respective aims of assessing the quality of diagnostic studies included in systematic reviews and improve the quality of reporting of diagnostic studies in general.
Both tools were tested by a small panel including two former DTTBs, a former DTTB Program Coordinator and the researchers conducting the assessment.
Moreover, motifs reported by multiple tools are more reliable.
Inter-tool merging: Calls which are generated by multiple tools are merged together.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com