Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
Numerical results obtained by both models are presented and discussed.
The results show that the transverse displacements predicted by both models are similar to each other when only the random transverse excitation is applied.
When the inner layer is thin and soft, the pressures, as well as stresses, obtained by both models are similar to each other, and the two models are equivalent.
The results obtained by comparison of the seismic responses estimated by both models are used to build and propose a specific criterion that can be used to elucidate under which circumstances is it possible to neglect the structural flexibility.
When mean densities are matched with measured values, velocity profiles (scaled by the centerline velocities) predicted by both models are found to be in fair agreement with the experimental data.
The probabilities forecast by both models are given by simple equations including t-distribution function.
Similar(51)
The results of the penetration simulation obtained by using both models are similar qualitatively.
In our intensive care unit setting, if data are collected day by day then both models are technically identical survival models and provide identical results, even though the Cox model is less restrictive.
This means that, in practical estimations of magnetic fields caused by dc-electrified railways, both models are equally applicable.
As both models are sold by Currys/PC World, you may be able to see them side-by-side.
Both models are made by General Atomics, a contractor based in San Diego.
More suggestions(16)
by both men are
by both artists are
by both companies are
by both detectors are
by both algorithms are
by both platforms are
by both analyses are
by both strategies are
by both models converge
by both logics are
by both teams are
by both parties are
by both sexes are
by both approaches are
by both cameras are
by both models reach
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com