Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Prevalence estimated by both methods differed among administrative divisions.
Similar(59)
Values of Δ HvHo and Δ SvHo obtained from both methods differed by less than ±1%.
Mean value and standard deviation of both methods differ by 0.3nm and 0.2nm, respectively, which is in agreement within the measurement accuracy.
The cited authors showed that the values calculated using data obtained by different methods differed significantly; clinical interpretation and consequent therapeutic decision-making could be adversely affected.
Gestational age was calculated from last menstrual period and validated with first-trimester ultrasound; if gestational ages calculated by the two methods differed by > 8%, ultrasound dating was used.
With a median follow-up of 9.5 years for these patients, the 5-year DSS estimates should be stable, and the estimates by the four methods differed by only 1%, to be 19 or 20%.
*Akaike values obtained by the two methods differed significantly (two-tailed tests, Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, p ≤ 0.0042).
The statistical analysis confirmed that the estimates of binding potentials of [N-methyl-11C]mirtazapine provided by the six methods differed significantly (χ2 = 64.4, df = 5, p < 0.001), and it is evident from the table that the values obtained by the two-tissue compartment model differed markedly from those provided by the other methods.
CAS was a reliable method for measuring BML and more sensitive to detect changes over time than MS. The BML volumes measured by the two methods differed but were significantly correlated.
The instances where the database results analysed by conventional biostatistical methods differed importantly from the results in the trial presumably reflect unmeasured confounding by indication in the database studies.
One of the problems is that the degrees of stringency applied by different detection methods differ, leading to different estimates of the numbers of LCRs in the same dataset.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com