Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
Given a normal logic program, we show that by adding, for each loop in the program, a corresponding loop formula to the program's completion, we obtain a one-to-one correspondence between the answer sets of the program and the models of the resulting propositional theory.
Indeed, the embranchment count was calculated by adding, for each molecule, the number of atoms involved in 3 or more covalent bonds, corresponding to the Canvas descriptors: ssssC_Cnt, sssCH_Cnt, sssNH_Cnt, sssN_Cnt, ssssN_Cnt, dssSe_Cnt, ssssssSe_Cnt, ddssSe_Cnt, sssSnH_Cnt, ssssSn_Cnt.
For any graph G, let G′ denote the graph obtained from G by adding, for each vertex v of G, a new vertex v′ and a new edge joining v to v′.
This is achieved by adding for each SM i at time t a random share s i in the range 1,…,κ−1 to the meter value m i.
Expression levels were calculated by adding, for each base pair, the number of times that base pair was encountered in the RNA-Seq data.
In addition, for simplicity of the MST construction we make the graph connected by adding for each i an edge of high weight between reads r i and r i+1.
Similar(51)
The alignment score between s1 and s2 is obtained from an alignment [ 35] of s1 and s2 by adding 1 for each matching position, and -1 for each mismatch, insertion and deletion.
It is calculated by adding 1 for each supporting spanning read and a probabilistic weight for each spanning pair, proportional to the likelihood of observing the paired reads at their observed positions on the contigs given the estimated distance between the contigs and assuming a normal insert length distribution model.
The clinical flaking score (CFS) was calculated by adding scores for each of the three aspects [ 3].
Summary measures of home ETS exposure duration and lifetime hours of exposure (years × hours) were calculated by adding estimates for each home.
The aim was to create a single score that can be easily calculated by adding weighted scores for each factor for each subject.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com