Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
If the evaluations of the 2 physicians are different, the case will be assessed by a third evaluator.
Similar(59)
Disagreements were resolved by discussion among authors and in case of persistent disagreement by adjudication of a third evaluator.
Two independent reviewers extracted information from each trial, with discrepancies resolved by discussion with a third evaluator.
There was also a check for discrepancy: if the two scores diverged by more than one point, a third evaluator would be given a score to be compared to the previous two scores.
A consensus assessment was obtained by endorsing the opinion of a third evaluator (MKG).
Later evaluations were performed by research fellows and cross-checked by a second evaluator.
Differences of opinion were resolved by reaching a consensus with the assistance of a third evaluator (H.Tb).
Differences in opinion were resolved by re-evaluating the sections and in some cases by reaching a consensus with the assistance of a third evaluator.
We conducted a peer evaluation with two reviewers and a third evaluator who resolved discrepancies.
The SKS was determined by two previously trained professionals, and in case of disagreement, a third evaluator was considered [ 15].
A third evaluator (AAS) independently read all the journals.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com