Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The hypothesis of positive selection on Potamogeton rbcL was also supported by a test comparing M8 against the null model M8A (Table 2), which may be more robust than M1A vs. M2A or M7 vs. M8 [30].
C4.5 builds a DT top-down, by recursively partitioning the data at each step by a test comparing a feature to a value.
Similar(58)
The percentage of agreement difference between Fall 2006 and Fall 2009/Spring 2010 is statistically significant, as shown by a P test comparing Fall 2006 with Fall 2009 or Spring 2010, with an α of.05%.
Varying selective pressure along the genes was assessed by a LRT test comparing the site-specific model M3 (discrete) with 2 or 3 classes of sites displaying different ω, against the M0 model (one-ratio).
Variation in the amount of mtDNA between different tissues was assessed by a t test, comparing values between controls and experimental animals.
The significance of the interactions was determined by a likelihood ratio test comparing a full model including the interaction term with the main effect model.
For inflammation, neuronal necrosis, and apoptosis scores, statistical analysis included a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a Dunn's test comparing all treatment groups using a confidence level of 95%.
We further confirmed our results by performing a similar test comparing models M7 (Beta) and M8 (Beta with positive selection), again using a χ 2 distribution with two degrees of freedom [ 86].
Non-inferiority of lumiracoxib for the primary outcome variable (1-year retention on treatment) was tested by a non-inferiority test comparing pairwise differences using a multiple testing procedure to adjust for multiplicity and a confidence interval (CI) approach with a predefined non-inferiority margin of -10%.
P-values were determined by a likelihood ratio test, comparing the full model with a model lacking the fixed effect term.
This statement is confirmed by a χ2-test comparing the four- to the two-dimensional PCM, χ2 7) = 259.156, p < .001.001
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com