Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
However, systematic bias was minimised by a standardised data collection method for all patients with independent assessments of relevance of presentations by two investigators.
Similar(59)
Data were extracted independently by one reviewer using a standardised data extraction table and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer.
All data from included studies were extracted by two reviewers using a standardised data extraction form.
Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers using a standardised data extraction sheet.
Relevant data from each article were extracted independently by two authors using a standardised data extraction form (Additional file 1).
Selected studies were quality assessed, using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, were data extracted by two reviewers using a standardised data extraction form and statistically synthesised where appropriate using the fixed-effect inverse-variance method.
Data were extracted by one reviewer (TP) using a standardised data extraction form and checked by another (RT).
Data were extracted by one reviewer (ZL) using a standardised data extraction form and checked independently by a second (JTC).
Data extraction was conducted by two review authors using a standardised data extraction form.
Patients' records were reviewed by one of us, using a standardised data collection form with predefined criteria.
Data extraction was conducted by two reviewers (RW and AA) and checked by a third reviewer (JTC) using a standardised data extraction form (see Additional file 1: Appendix 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com