Suggestions(2)
Exact(4)
The anodization process was controlled by a source meter (Keithley, Model: 2425) connected to a computer.
The resistance change value was measured and stored by a source meter (Keithley 2400, Keithley Instruments, Inc., Cleveland, USA) and LabVIEW (National Instrument Corp., Austin, USA) software, respectively.
The biased voltage as well as voltage and current readings were provided by a source meter (2400, Kiethley Instruments Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA).
The current voltage (I-V) characteristics of the devices were measured by a source meter (Keithley 2400, Keithley Instruments, Inc., OH, USA).
Similar(56)
Conductivity measurements of TiO2 films were measured by using a source meter (Keithley 2400).
Current density-voltage (J-V) curves of the devices were performed by using a source meter (Keithley 2440) and under standard illumination (AM 1.5 G, 100 mW cm−2) from a Newport Oriel Solar Simulator.
The vacuum gauge output was measured by using a source meter (Keithley 2400, Cleveland, OH, USA) and LabVIEW software (National Instruments Corp., Austin, TX, USA). Figure 1 Structure of MWCNT device and FE-SEM image of MWCNT paste after heat treatment.
The device current-voltage curves and PCE were obtained by Labview software and a source meter (National Instruments, model NI PXI-1033, TX, USA).
The current density-voltage curves and PCE of solar cell devices were obtained by a solar simulator and a source meter (National Instruments, model NI PXI-1033, TX, USA) under AM1.5G solar irradiation with intensity of 1000 W/m2.
The current density-voltage characteristics of photocurrent density-photovoltage were simulated at AM 1.5G illumination (100 mV cm−2, XES-301S, SAN EI, Osaka, Japan) and recorded by a Keithley source meter (Keithley, Cleveland, OH, USA).
The current-voltage (I-V) and endurance characteristics of the device were measured by a Keithley 2635 source meter (Keithley Instruments, Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA) and a probe station at room temperature in a voltage sweep mode.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com