Sentence examples for by a simple binding from inspiring English sources

In our previous experiments on HSA binding to the same type of nanoparticles we found that the binding data were well fitted by a simple binding model devoid of any apparent cooperativity or inter-protein interaction phenomena [1].

In all cases, the data are well described by a simple binding mechanism.

The data are poorly fit by a simple binding equation (n = 1 eq 1) but are fit by Ki of ∼2 μM and Hill coefficients of ∼3 4, as shown in Table S1.

In this case, binding of lipid B (BrSA) could be described by a simple binding equation 12The equilibrium constant describing competitive binding (eq 2) has no units, whereas the association constant describing the simple binding reaction (eq 12) will have units of reciprocal mole fraction.

A single-exponential fit of the data as predicted by the kinetic model obtained by considering a simple binding reaction between tBid and the membranes equation (3), gives an average relaxation rate k=(0.013±0.005)/s (mean±S.D., n=3) at this lipid concentration.

Inhibition constants were obtained by fitting to a simple binding curve (Stambach and Taylor 2003) using SigmaPlot.

The apparent Kd of each construct to different ligands was determined by fitting the data with a simple binding isotherm: I = (r−rmin)/(rmax−rmin) = [L]/ Kd+[L]), where [L] is the ligand concentration, r the ratio, rmin the minimum ratio in the absence of ligand and rmax the maximum ratio with saturating ligand.

Isothermal titration calorimetric data suggested a simple binding for G1, whereas a biphasic binding was evident for G4 and G7 with an initial exothermic binding and a secondary endothermic formation of larger dendriplex aggregates, followed by agglomeration.

Thus, the existence of the two natural classes is not due to a simple binding selection.

On the surface, this predicts that binding of IHF to its cognate I1 element should be described well by a simple Langmuir binding model and that the Hill coefficient should be 1; this is obviously not the case.

Thus the results seen here cannot be explained by a simple cooperative binding effect of one metal ion on another.