The main effect of category was qualified by a significant interaction with the parent variable,,.
This reversal was corroborated by a significant interaction between the kind of feature (perceptual or semantic) and the kind of task (visual perception or memory recall task).
This is supported by a significant interaction between latitude and time of year for both markers (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1; ITS2, LR68,1 = 34.2, P = 0.002; rbcL, LR68,1 = 47.36, P = 0.001).
Response of DMI to forage family depended on pVDMI, as indicated by a significant interaction between treatment and pVDMI in predicting DMI.
Like in the behavioural experiments, a consistent reversal between perception and memory was supported by a significant interaction between the type of feature that was probed (perceptual or semantic), and the type of task participants were engaged in (encoding or retrieval).
The ANOVA also revealed significant effect of 'rhythm', with greater amplitudes for the unsyncopated rhythm compared to the syncopated rhythm (F1,17 = 37.16, p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.68), which was qualified by a significant interaction between 'frequency' and 'rhythm' (F1,17 = 41.04, p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.70).
Data on order of habitat occupation suggested that yearlings were not as good as older males at identifying territories with a permanently short field layer (as reflected by a significant interaction between male age and order of occupancy).
Sub-surface saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) averaged higher at 4.0 cm h−1 (range: 0 68.2 cm h−1), was influenced by a significant interaction between both disturbance and demolition factors, and controlled by subsurface soil texture and presence/absence of unconsolidated buried debris.
The difference in group response to ethanol was confirmed by a significant interaction of ethanol treatment versus group in the two-way ANOVA.
However, this effect was moderated by a significant interaction between Direction and Speed, F (2,152) = 4.6, p = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.06.
This was confirmed by a significant interaction between target prevalence and target presence, F 1, 140) = 103.23, p < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.42, driven by a much larger prevalence effect in target-absent trials.
