Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
For quality control of parasitological examinations, 10% of all slides were randomly selected and re-examined by a reference microscopist.
Similar(59)
Discordant results were resolved by a third reference microscopist.
Agreement between the study microscopist and the reference microscopist was 91.7% and a kappa of 0.83.
The reference microscopists used standard solutions of 3% Giemsa to stain the slides.
Assessors of trial laboratory outcomes (reference microscopists and laboratory technologists) were blind to the allocation of the patient.
For quality control purposes, 10% of slides were re-examined by an expert microscopist at a reference laboratory in Blantyre, Malawi.
According to a study published online by The New England Journal of Medicine, the test is 98 percent accurate when compared with positive results from the old method -- examination of sputum by a trained microscopist.
Slides with discrepant results were re-read by a 3rd microscopist.
Slides were read by a trained microscopist for the speciation and quantification of malaria parasites; and a random selection of slides was read by a second trained microscopist to assure quality control.
Thick blood smear was prepared as recommended by the Walker technique [23] and evaluated by a local microscopist.
In case of a difference in results (positive/negative; species diagnosis) between the two microscopists, the blood smear was re-examined by a third microscopist independent of the earlier findings and the third reading accepted as the final result.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com