Sentence examples for by a mean difference from inspiring English sources

The ICPBC method underestimated the induced LLD by a mean difference ± standard deviation of 3.8 ± 10.3mm (p =.055) and the radiologic measure by 5.1 ± 8.6mm (p =.043).

The intervention group had statistically significantly fewer individuals with injurious falls (OR=.56; 95% CI,.32-.98; P=.041) and less deterioration in physical performance, reflected by a mean difference of 0.6 in SPPB scores (P=.029).

A recent evaluation of MOD17 GPP for Africa, based on eddy covariance data, concluded that MOD17A2 underestimated GPP by a mean difference of 0.70 g C m−2 day−1 but seasonality was captured well [54].

Application of both BFA and NNLS revealed that the average of the estimated subcellular distributions from the three independent gradients are very similar, characterized by a mean difference of about −0.1±2.3% (as mean ± SD) where 95% of the BFA-to-NNLS differences lay in a range of −5% to 4% with tailing at about ≥100% due to the abovementioned algorithms differences (Figure 5A).

During years 2 and 3, STF outperformed the quarterly national average by a mean difference of 18%%.

A higher level of agreement is illustrated by a mean difference closer to zero and a smaller range of the 95% confidence interval.

The measurements of depressive features on the CDSS in this cohort were found to be statistically highly significantly different from anxiety features as measured by the HAM-A (mean difference = 4.84; 95% CI = 3.0 to 6.69; t = 5.27; p < 0.0001) and the S-SARS (mean difference = 12.43; 95% CI = 10.24 to 14.63; t = 11.37; p < 0.0001).

Our results confirmed this by showing a mean difference of 1.6 ± 1.6 mm (range 0 to 5 mm) compared to the conventional US technique.

In the present study, sample size was calculated by considering a mean difference of mast cell counts between the study group and the control group.

By hypothesizing a mean difference of 0.1 unit with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.14, with a power of 80% and α = 0.05, a minimum number of 20 subjects was required for the study.

There was no correlation between face width and face length (r = 0.0919 p = 0.6353) for the study group as illustrated in Figure 3. Fit factor did not differ significantly by gender with a mean difference of 1.2 (p = 0.9830) despite significant differences in the facial dimensions (Table 4).