Sentence examples for but very low for from inspiring English sources

Further, the researchers found that the transition rate (gain or loss of toxicity) was high for non-toxic lineages (blue bump; Figure 1C) but very low for chemically defended lineages (red bump; Figure 1C).

This happens because the activation energy — the energy required to motivate us to do something — is very high for things that don't promise an immediate payoff (for example, one spinning class isn't going to give us Naomi Campbell's legs), but very low for things that play into our desire for immediate gratification.

When separated from many other variance components, additive genetic variance was high for the ornament itself (forehead patch size, FPS treated as a male trait) but very low for female preference (mate FPS treated as a female trait).

Twin correlations for XCI patterns were high for MZ twins (r = 0.71 at age 5 and r = 0.50 at age 10, respectively) but very low for DZ twins at both ages (r = 0.17 at age 5 and r = −0.24 at age 10, respectively), concurring with existing data [11], [14].

The R2-values of all these fits were low to moderate for students but very low for employees (R2 = 0.40, 0.14, 0.037, 0.061 for Huangshan and Shenzhen students, and Huangshan and Shenzhen local employees, respectively), indicating substantial residual variation in distances within categories.

Onomap sensitivity is high for White and Asian names (99.8% and 82.1%, respectively), but very low for Black names (4.4% Ryan et al, 2012).

I also have a very low tolerance for undue drama.

"Calling out extremists, white supremacists, neo-Nazis is an important but very low bar for where we should be as a society at this stage in our democracy," Nelson told HuffPost.

In addition, we observed the presence of TRPC2 in the aorta, but very low signals for TRPC4 and C5.

This strategy, however, is limited because for some reasonable/high quality studies (as defined by the median score), the scoring may have resulted in a high score being achieved under one assessment criteria (e.g. selection) but very low scores for another criteria (e.g. outcome).

The predictive values of the test, based on a 0.2% prevalence, was >99.9% for negative results, but very low (7%) for coproantigen-positive results.