Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
Finally, we evaluated a heterogeneous patient population but the multivariate analysis we performed adjusted for a large number of variables, which are known to influence outcome prediction.
A decreasing prevalence of opium use with increasing level of education was observed, but the multivariate analysis showed that the effect of education was not significant.
In the present analysis, peritoneal metastasis had some prognostic value at the univariate analysis, but the multivariate analysis failed to show any independent prognostic significance.
The univariate analysis showed a double risk of infection in patients suffering from this condition, but the multivariate analysis did not confirm CKD as a factor independently associated with Gram-negative infections.
This last point is difficult to prevent to get a sufficient sample size of patients but the multivariate analysis allows us to identify the main risk factors of osteoporosis.
In the univariate analysis, only the nuclear expression of YB-1 was a significant predictor of poor prognosis, but the multivariate analysis revealed the nuclear expression of YB-1 was identified as significant factors (Table 3).
Similar(50)
Hypotension and hypoxemia was positively related with delirium occurrence in univariate analysis, but after the multivariate analysis both variables did not promote a better model considering APS simultaneously.
This change was significant in the bivariate analysis (P<.001) but not the multivariate analysis.
Its associations with DSS and MeFS were significant in the univariate analysis but not the multivariate analysis.
The reason for discontinuation of the last biologic agent prior to abatacept initiation was a significant predictor of abatacept retention in the univariate but not the multivariate analysis.
There was some imbalance between the groups in terms of distribution across study centers, but in the multivariate analysis, study center effect was controlled for.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com