Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The aim was to include 140 patients but the final sample consisted of 136 patients.
Primary data were collected on 485 CARD patients but the final sample yielded a total of 329 participants based on incomplete secondary clinical data from chart review.
Similar(58)
All but one agreed, so the final sample included eight participants.
An additional eight five-month-olds were tested but not included in the final sample because they had too many motion artefacts, resulting in too few usable trials for analysis (minimum number of four trials per condition).
Eight additional infants were tested but not included in the final sample due to fussiness (n = 3), excessive artifacts (n = 4), or technical problems with data collection (n = 1).
After eliminating cases with missing or out-of-range gestational age (< 18 weeks or > 45 weeks), missing parity, maternal age less than 12 years, stillbirths or multiple births, and birth weight <400 grams but gestation >22 weeks, the final sample consisted of 80,989 births.
Two papers described methodology only [ 6, 9], with no independent research question; these were not counted in the final sample, but the content of each used to aid quality appraisal of their respective related paper.
All 10 hospital departments were represented in the final sample, but response rates varied by department, ranging from 50% (Dept of Genetic Medicine and Laboratory) to 69% (Dept of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care).
The final sample consisted of 132 participants.
The final sample comprised 242 subjects.
Furthermore, we provide characteristics regarding the final sample acquired.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com