but the evidence is

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "but the evidence is" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when introducing a contrast or exception regarding the evidence in a discussion or argument. Example: "Many believe the theory is valid, but the evidence is lacking to support such a claim."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But the evidence is patchy.

The Economist

But the evidence is indirect.

The Economist

But the evidence is more mixed.

The New York Times

Perhaps, but the evidence is inconclusive.

The New York Times - Books

But the evidence is, at best, mixed.

The New York Times

But the evidence is conclusive.

The Guardian

But the evidence is different.

The New York Times

But the evidence is impressive.

The Guardian - Opinion

"But the evidence is scant".

The New York Times

But the evidence is there.

The Guardian - Opinion

But the evidence is incomplete.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "but the evidence is" to introduce a contrasting point or to challenge a previous statement with factual information. This clarifies that your counter-argument is based on verifiable data.

Common error

Avoid using "but the evidence is" without providing specific details or sources to support your contrasting claim. Ensure that your statement is substantiated to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "but the evidence is" functions as a contrastive conjunction, used to introduce a statement that opposes or qualifies a preceding assertion. It signals that the available evidence does not support the prior claim, as validated by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

73%

Academia

10%

Science

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "but the evidence is" serves as a crucial linguistic tool for introducing counter-arguments grounded in factual data. It's widely used across diverse contexts, especially within news and media, and academic domains. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and highlights its role in presenting a contrasting perspective. When employing this phrase, it's important to ensure that the subsequent statement is supported by verifiable details, maintaining credibility and enhancing the persuasiveness of your argument. Alternatives such as "however, the proof suggests" can provide a more formal tone when needed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

however, the proof suggests

Emphasizes the existence of proof, but in a contrasting way.

yet, the data indicates

Highlights data as the source of the contrasting information.

nevertheless, the findings reveal

Focuses on the outcome of a study or investigation.

nonetheless, the facts suggest

Points to specific facts that contradict a previous statement.

still, the research implies

Indicates that research suggests an alternative perspective.

even so, the documentation shows

Highlights existing documentation that presents a different view.

despite that, the signs suggest

Emphasizes that despite initial impressions, signs point to something else.

conversely, the support is weak

Highlights the absence of strong support for a claim.

on the contrary, the substantiation is lacking

Directly contradicts a previous statement by emphasizing the lack of proof.

in contrast, the validation is uncertain

Emphasizes a difference, focusing on the uncertainty of validation.

FAQs

How can I use "but the evidence is" in a sentence?

Use "but the evidence is" to introduce a contrasting point, showing that available information does not support a previous claim. For example, "Many believe this product is harmful, but the evidence is /s/inconclusive.".

What's a more formal alternative to "but the evidence is"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases such as "however, the proof suggests" or "nevertheless, the findings reveal". These alternatives offer a similar function but convey greater formality.

What's the difference between "but the evidence is" and "but the testimony is"?

"But the evidence is" refers to factual data that either supports or refutes a claim. In contrast, "but the testimony is" refers to statements or accounts given by individuals, which may be subjective or biased. Evidence is usually considered more objective than testimony.

When is it appropriate to use "but the evidence is"?

It's appropriate to use "but the evidence is" when presenting a counter-argument based on factual information that contradicts a previous statement or belief. It's best used when the evidence is clear and verifiable.