We find a slight but significant main effect of sex in freezing extinction learning (F1,112=4.02, p=0.048, 2-way repeated measures ANOVA).
There was a very small but significant main effect of Neuter Status on IA (p = 0.03, η2 = 0.005), with neutered dogs (M = 0.20, SE = 0.01) having higher IA scores than Intact dogs (Table 4).
At 16°, both the mtDNA and the nuclear genome have small but significant main effects on development (Table S1).
But no significant main effect of group (VC: p = 0.49, RMSSD: p = 0.57, VLF power: p = 0.61, LF power: p = 0.84, HF power: p = 0.21, LF/HF: p = 0.65, HR: p = 0.15) and no significant interaction between block and group were found for all parameters during the mental stress test.
This analysis revealed significant main effects of task-relatedness and stimulus-dependency but no significant main effect of regions and no significant interaction effect, therefore demonstrating similar additive effects of the two dimensions of conscious experiences for both regions of MPFC.
Indeed, among animals that received footshock (i.e., DS, IS and LI groups), ANOVAs indicate no main effect of group during the first 4 minutes in the chamber (F2,21 = .092, P = .913) but a significant main effect of group during the last 4 (postshock) minutes in the chamber (F2,21 = 21.199, P = .000; P's<.05 for DS vs. IS & LI groups, Tukey's HSD).
The 2 (group) × 2 (cue valence) ANOVA showed no main effect of diagnostic group (p =.471), but a significant main effect of cue valence.
There was no significant difference (P = 0.15) in terms of MMSE (Fig. 3B) between Higher Education and Lower Education subjects, but a significant main effect of Diagnosis (P < 10−4).
For negative interpretations, there were significant main effects of Time, F 1, 90) = 5.04, p =.03, partial η = 0.05, and Presentation, F 1, 90) = 4.18, p =.04, partial η = 0.04, but no significant main effect of Condition, F 1, 90) < 1.
This time there was a small but statistically significant main effect for mathematical model, F 1, 2272) = 11.87, p = .001, partial η = .005.005
Lordosis intensity did not differ within groups but a significant main effect of stress revealed that lordosis intensity was significantly suppressed by stress (F 1, 61) = 5.15, p = 0.0268).
