Sentence examples for but not significant coefficient from inspiring English sources

The former with a slightly higher but not significant coefficient of correlation than the latter gives a lager value for the angle of frictional resistance.

The control variable Decision representing the number of persons who are affected by the investment decision of the respondent has a positive, but not significant coefficient, which may be explained by the fact that more SR investors make investment decisions on behalf of others compared to the subset of non-SR investors, as discussed in Sect. 4.

Our empirical analysis obtains the expected sign, since shifting is lower in more redistributive systems, but the effect is not significant (coefficient 0.10, column VIII in Table 6 .14.

We do not report the same exercise with both measures of technical change in the same specification, although it yields a significant coefficient for our measure and a not significant coefficient for the alternative.17.17

Although the Harbord test was not significant (coefficient 1.220, SE = 0.311, p = 0.059), the contour-enhanced funnel plot showed asymmetry (ESM Fig.  1b).

Interactions between PCoA1 and the lakes were likewise not significant (coefficients of interactions, t > 0.22, P > 0.83).

If the quadratic term for follow-up time and the pre-progression group by quadratic time variable were not significant, coefficients for models with linear terms only are shown.

However, allele frequencies for the remaining 12 microsatellites did not differ significantly with geographic distance, with two loci (p66 and p70) having negative, but not significant, regression coefficients (Table 1).

The coefficient is negative, but not significant.

Regression analysis indicates that voucher facilities scored 1.7%% lower than non-voucher facilities, but this difference was not statistically significant; coefficient -1.70 (95 % CI) (-4.9, 1.5), p = 0.294 (Table  6).

The moderating effect of initial depression was also greater in patients who used unguided low intensity interventions, compared with those who used guided interventions, but again the difference was not significant (interaction coefficient −0.07 (−0.30 to 0.15)).