Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Let q be the number of the rows in R(i) but not in R c i, i + 1), i.e. q = |R(i) −R c i, i + 1) |.
Similar(59)
Two different SNPs, rs16847024 and rs6022990, had nominally significant p values in L-CRC but not in R-CRC nor in all CRCs.
In silico analysis of the number of TM domains also indicated that proteins predicted to contain eight to twelve alpha-helices were enriched in G-DIMs but not in R-DIMs, relative to microsomes.
Finally, we remarked that dynamin-2B, flotillin, stomatin and leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins belonged to those membrane-localized proteins predicted to contain 2 beta-strands, which were enriched in G- but not in R-DIMs relative to microsomes.
Hyperemic flow was negatively correlated significantly with total and central adiposity in men (r = −0.34 and r = −0.48, respectively; P < .05), but not in women (r = −0.26 and r = 0.03, respectively; P = NS).
This gene was significantly correlated to pfcrt in CQS parasites (r = 0.53) but not in CQR (r = −0.1) parasites.
Correlation coefficients between the right hippocampus and right VTA/SN were significant in Reward (r = 0.67, P < 0.05) and Control (Control: r = 0.76, P < 0.05), but not in Punishment (r = 0.33, P = 0.11).
Results revealed a positive relationship between P2 and CI in PostNP PreNP (r = 0.44, P < 0.04) but not in PostP PreP (r = −0.17, P < 0.26) and a significant interaction between the nonphonemic and phonemic training contrasts (r = 0.44, P < 0.04).
However, thoracolumbar fascia shear strain was negatively correlated with pain duration in males with LBP (r = -0.46, p <.0004) but not in females (r = -0.07, p =.67).
E2 and FEI decreased in controls but not in patients (r = -0.33, p < 0.001 and r = -0.28, p < 0.001, respectively), but patients had lower E2 levels in all groups of age (table 4).
Although triglyceride levels were not different between groups Ile and Leu as a continuous variable, they correlated moderately to adiposity measurements only in II (r 0.43, p = 0.02), but not in IL+LL (r 0.04, p = 0.84) group.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com