but no collateral

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "but no collateral" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing loans, agreements, or situations where something is provided without requiring security or guarantees. Example: "The lender agreed to provide the funds, but no collateral was needed from the borrower."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

mdrl transfectants showed cross-resistance to cationic amphiphiles, but no collateral sensitivity to nonionic species.

British Journal of Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The M.L.B. filing said that its plan requires no collateral from the team, but that the Highbridge loan requires liens on all the Dodgers' assets.

The New York Times - Sports

But police spokesman Pierre Nkurikiye said there were "no collateral victims" during Friday clashes.

Vice

But banks are understandably leery of lending to people with no collateral and uncertain future earnings.

The New Yorker

The average expected return may be high, but there is wide variation about the average". There's no collateral to sell off if you realize you over-borrowed.

HuffPost

But Grameen's much simpler trust-based loans to poor women with no collateral seem to be doing well.

HuffPost

But because judges would be reluctant to accept a bond with little or no collateral securing it, some bondsmen have been suspected of lying in court papers about how much collateral they received.

The New York Times

No collateral, said JPMorgan.

The New York Times

There was no collateral damage..

The Guardian

But in an effort to generate business, some bondsmen have taken shortcuts, posting bonds with little or no collateral.

The New York Times

It said there were no collateral civilian casualties.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "but no collateral" to clearly indicate a situation where an agreement or transaction occurs without any assets being pledged as security. This is particularly useful in financial, legal, or strategic contexts where the absence of collateral is a significant factor.

Common error

Avoid using "but no collateral" when you actually mean there is minimal collateral, not a complete absence. The phrase implies a total lack of security, so ensure the context accurately reflects this.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "but no collateral" functions as a conjunction phrase that introduces a contrast or exception. It typically follows a statement and indicates that despite what was previously mentioned, there is no security or assets pledged. According to Ludwig, it is a correct phrase.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "but no collateral" is a grammatically correct conjunction phrase used to introduce a contrasting element, specifying the absence of security in an agreement, loan, or situation. Ludwig confirms its correctness and usability in written English. While relatively uncommon, its usage spans across news, media and scientific contexts. The phrase serves to clarify and emphasize the lack of typical safeguards. Alternatives include "yet without security" and "though lacking guarantees". When using this phrase, ensure the context accurately reflects a complete absence of collateral.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

yet without security

Replaces "but" with "yet" and uses "without security" to specify the lack of collateral.

though lacking guarantees

Substitutes "but" with "though" and uses "lacking guarantees" to highlight the absence of any assurances.

however, no security was pledged

Replaces "but" with "however" and specifies that "no security was pledged", clarifying the absence of collateral.

still with no pledges

Uses "still" to introduce a contrast and emphasizes the absence of "pledges", synonymous with collateral.

even so, no guarantees

Employs "even so" to indicate a contrast and focuses on the lack of "guarantees", similar to collateral.

nonetheless, no surety provided

Replaces "but" with "nonetheless" and indicates that "no surety" (a form of guarantee) was provided.

despite this, unsecured

Highlights the unsecured nature of the agreement or situation, implying no collateral was involved.

in contrast, no assets at stake

Uses "in contrast" to show the difference and specifies that "no assets" were at risk or pledged as collateral.

conversely, no liens attached

Indicates the absence of any liens, which would typically be associated with collateralized agreements.

then again, no backing

Expresses the lack of "backing", referring to the absence of assets supporting the agreement or loan.

FAQs

How can I use "but no collateral" in a sentence?

You can use "but no collateral" to indicate that something was provided or agreed upon without any security or assets pledged. For instance, "The loan was approved, but no collateral was required because of the borrower's excellent credit history."

What does "but no collateral" mean in financial terms?

In financial terms, "but no collateral" means that a loan or credit is extended without the borrower pledging any assets (like property or equipment) as security for repayment. This makes the loan riskier for the lender.

What are some alternatives to saying "but no collateral"?

Alternatives include phrases like "yet without security", "though lacking guarantees", or "unsecured", all of which convey the idea of something being provided without any assets pledged as security.

Is it common for loans to be issued "but no collateral"?

It is less common for substantial loans to be issued "but no collateral", as lenders typically require security to mitigate their risk. However, smaller loans, loans to borrowers with excellent credit, or loans from family and friends may sometimes be granted without collateral.