Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The genome of MmmSC PG1 is larger than that of Mmc 95010, its very close relative, but has less coding capacity.
Similar(59)
It has been reported that mixed spatial-resolution stereoscopic video coding has less coding complexity and provides better rate-distortion than symmetric coding [1 3].
Having less code to deal with makes it more manageable.
The Mycobacterium leprae genome has less than 50% coding capacity and 1,133 pseudogenes.
However, the punctured code has less reliable performance than the non-punctured code and requires higher power to achieve good performance over the main channel.
In addition, wavelet-based coding has less variability in video distortion distribution and better robustness in cases of transmission error, compared with DCT-based coding.
The figure shows that the code with dB performs well for low as expected, while the code with lower has less UEP capability but better average performance at high.
From these results, it is clear that the proposed prediction architecture is a better choice than 3D-DMB when coding videos which contain a single scene, while it gives inferior coding efficiency, it has less computational complexity and less memory complexity compared to the HBP architecture.
It has less complexity than cascades source, channel coding, and encryption while its key space in comparison to other joint methods has enlarged.
In a study of five Plasmodium species we noted that Plasmodium transcription factors and parasite lifestyle-associated genes might behave similarly as they have less constrained coding regions (higher dN/dS or rates of nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site to synonymous substitutions per synonymous site) than other groups of genes [ 30].
Where these programs succeed in giving students lifetime career skills, though, has less to do with the nuances of coding and more to do with the skills students develop while working with their colleagues.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com