Sentence examples for but detectable differences in from inspiring English sources

Microbes that live on grape plants—specifically, yeast of the species Saccharomyces cerevisiae vary from place to place in ways that cause subtle but detectable differences in the taste of the resulting wine.

Adduct levels in DNA isolated from smokers were highest in human heart and lung tissue with smaller but detectable differences in placental tissue and lung lavage cells.

If a gravitational wave passed through, it would stretch and compress these lengths, depending on its orientation, creating a small but detectable difference in the length of the two arms.

The dilution of RA blood by coronary venous blood of lower [Lac] is a plausible explanation for the small but detectable difference in [Lac] from RA to PA.

In agreement with previous studies showing that age-induced differential methylation may occur without changes in gene expression [ 44], we found genes with DNA methylation changes over time but without detectable differences in expression.

This structure shows structural features that correspond to a protein from bacterial subclass IA but with detectable differences in the mobility of specific loops when compared with other known bacterial FPRs.

Coastal populations showed significantly higher haplotype diversity (but not nucleotide diversity) than pond populations, but there were no detectable differences in haplotype diversity among different freshwater habitat types (viz. river, lake and pond populations), or between coastal and lake/river populations.

During ischemia (30 min), PCr concentrations decreased to 54 +/- 2% and 52 +/- 6% of the resting values in pre-immobilized and immobilized muscles, respectively, but there were no detectable differences in the rates of P i) increase or PCr depletion (0.55 +/- 0.01 mM min -1) and 0.52 +/- 0.03 min -1(-1) before and after immobilization, respectively; p = 0.52).

The relatively short half-life of everolimus may result in short-lived inhibition of mTOR signalling at low doses, which may be sufficient to alter FDG uptake, but insufficient to induce detectable differences in S6 protein phosphorylation, cancer cell proliferation and eventually tumour size.

Differences in the number of alleles and the number of private alleles were detected among the categories in which the AMP-IL was subdivided, but interestingly, there were no detectable differences in terms of expected heterozygosity.

That said, there were many differences between the characteristics of the random and volunteer samples included in this study but these did not translate into detectable differences in the observed sodium excretion.