Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
Cytology based on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was reported to have a high specificity (97.2%) but a poor sensitivity (35.1%) for distinguishing benign IPMNs from malignant IPMNs [17].
These values had a good specificity and negative predictive value, but a poor sensitivity and positive predictive value.
Septum bowing has an excellent specificity (100%) but a poor sensitivity (26%) for predicting RV dysfunction [ 11].
As shown in Table 4, AR IHC positivity, evaluated alone in a ER setting, had a good specificity (100%95%5% CI: 75 to 99)) for MA tumors but a poor sensitivity (58%95%5% CI: 44 to 72)).
The area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operator curve (ROC) for M-SAA3 and CRP were not adequately sensitive and specific, but for Hp optimal cut off was determined to be 7.9 μg/ml (AUC = 0.78, odds ratio = 1.3) with an average specificity of 94.6%% but a poor sensitivity average of 52.9%%.
Similar(55)
Highest probability of correctly excluding patients without the condition is seen at a cut off of 0.4 points with an optimal specificity of 93.1% but resulting in a poor sensitivity (39.6%).
The conventional Ziehl-Neelsen method on smears is widely used and plays a key role in TB diagnosis, but it has a poor sensitivity in aspirates because of the small number of mycobacterial cells.
The NAAT had a poor sensitivity but high specificity.
Some of these small metastases can be detected by FDG-PET, albeit with a poor sensitivity of 29%, but with a high specificity of 88% [ 18].
However, it has a poor sensitivity [4].
However, in patients evaluated in the emergency department (ED), CXR showed a poor sensitivity (43.5%) when compared to CT [4].
More suggestions(16)
but a poor businessman
but a simple sensitivity
but a reversed sensitivity
but a poor outing
but a new sensitivity
but a poor basis
but a poor pass
but a poor manifesto
but a heightened sensitivity
but a poor translation
but a poor result
but a little sensitivity
but a poor school
but a poor header
but a poor ski
but a poor win-loss
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com