Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
One milliliter of 20 mM aqueous HAuCl4 and 4 mL of 100 mM aqueous PIPES-SS buffer were placed in 36 mL DI water under vigorous stirring at 150 °C for 10 min.
One milliliter of 20 mM aqueous HAuCl4 and 4 mL of 100 mM aqueous bis-tris methane buffer were placed in 36 mL DI water under vigorous stirring at 25 °C.
One milliliter of 20 mM aqueous HAuCl4 and 4 mL of 100 mM and aqueous bis-tris propane buffer were placed in 36 mL DI water under vigorous stirring at 100 °C for 5 min.
One milliliter of 20 mM aqueous HAuCl4 and 4 mL of 100 mM aqueous TEA buffer were placed in 36 mL DI water under vigorous stirring at 25 °C.
200 µl of 1 mM WT-ACD and 300 µl buffer were placed in the sample and reference cells, respectively.
Solutions of triggering anion in the same buffer were placed in syringe B. Fluorescence data were collected after 1 1 mixing of the two solutions.
Similar(54)
The enzymatic reaction mixture, comprising 1 ml of cellulase and 25 ml of 0.1 M acetate buffer, was placed in clean conical flasks.
Typically, 50 ml from SMJ with pH 7.0 ± 0.1 using MOPS buffer was placed in the beaker flasks with the soaking of 0.5 g of CUA, PACW, FW60, for 2 h with vigorous shaking at 30° C.
As a control, the same volume of M9 buffer was placed in adjacent wells.
A slightly larger volume (430 μL) of dialysis buffer was placed in the reference compartment.
Each of the sera diluted 1 231 in sample buffer was placed in two antigen coated microtiter plate wells.
More suggestions(17)
buffer were pooled in
buffer were tested in
buffer were solubilized in
buffer were spotted in
buffer were lysed in
buffer were heated in
buffer were combined in
buffer were retained in
buffer were resuspended in
buffer were included in
buffer were printed in
buffer were dissolved in
buffer were resolved in
buffer were collected in
buffer were frozen in
buffer were diluted in
buffer were homogenized in
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com