Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
A infinite size buffer model is used to ensure that all MSs want to transmit at all TSs.
In equation ∑ ∀ k ∈ M ψ k n, s ∈ 0, 1, note that there can be unassigned subcarriers only when the finite buffer model is used.
The results have shown that the optimization objective of maximizing the aggregate utility through a gradient scheduling algorithm can only be achieved when the less realistic full buffer model is used.
On the other hand, when the finite buffer model is used, the user throughput at 5% outage exhibits a maximum at α ≈ [0.75-1], and α values outside this range cause a performance loss.
When the finite buffer model is used, the relative performance of α = 0.6 improves with the cell load: for offered load below 10.5 Mbps there is small reduction of the outage but for loads above 10.5 Mbps α = 0.6 gains in outage user throughput; and regarding the average user throughput α = 0.6 provides a gain that reaches up to 60-70% for heavy offered load conditions (11-11.5 Mbps).
Similar(55)
Hence, a full buffer traffic model is used for all the users.
A full buffer traffic model is used, and all base station sites are assumed to be running at 100% load.
It is assumed that a full buffer traffic model is used, that is, infinite traffic waiting for each user.
But, when the finite buffer traffic model is used, the gradient scheduling algorithm does not keep this property.
Consequently, the results show that the α-fair gradient scheduling algorithm maximizes the average utility as long as the full buffer traffic model is used.
However, when the finite buffer traffic model is used, the maximization of the average utility does not hold for α = 1, but it is rather increased as α → 0. Figure 3b depicts the average utility when the utility function is the α-fair function with α = 0.5 (see (22)) reaching a similar conclusion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com