Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(5)
Following a wash in FACS buffer, cells were stained with anti-GL7 AlexaFluor 647 (eBioscience, UK) at 1 100 dilution, anti-CD95 PE (eBioscience, UK) at 1 100 dilution and anti-B220 PeBiosciencecience, UK) at 1 200 for 30 min at RT in the dark.
After incubation with the blocking buffer, cells were stained with anti-BrdU antibody (1 100; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) overnight at 4°C.
After washing twice with staining buffer, cells were stained with directly labelled anti-CD3 for 30 min on ice, washed and then fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde.
After washing with Annexin V binding buffer, cells were stained with 2000-fold diluted Cy5-labeled AnnexinV (Biovision, Milpitas, CA) and 500 nM Sytox blue (Invitrogen) and analyzed by flow cytometry.
After washing twice with 500 μl PBA buffer, cells were stained with Alexa-Fluor-488 coupled mouse anti-penta-His antibody (Qiagen) or rabbit anti-exotoxin A polyclonal antibodies and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC -labeled FITC -labeledents oF ab' 2lonal goat anti-rabbit antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich).
Similar(55)
After incubation in fix/perm buffers, cells were stained for intracellular antigens.
After washing with FACScan buffer, the cells were stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-mouse CD8a antibody.
After washing cells with one times permeabilization buffer twice, cells were stained with anti-human FOXP3-FITC antibody for 30 minutes at 4°C in the dark.
After further washing by rinse buffer, the cells were stained with the Alexa Fluor® 488 dye-labeled anti-BrdU antibodies for half an hour.
After the cells were washed three times with PBS buffer, the cells were stained with Prussian blue solution containing 20% (v/v) hydrochloric acid and 10% (v/v) potassium ferrocyanide solution or MRI phantom observation.
Following incubation with IC fixation buffer (eBioscience), cells were stained intracellularly with anti-IFN-γ PECy7, anti-IL-10 allophycocyanin, anti-IL-17A PE, and/ or anti-IL-4 PE (all eBioscience).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com