Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(36)
Antigen retrieval was performed in a pressure cooker (5 minutes at max temperature) in high pH Tris-EDTA buffer and samples were cooled for 15 minutes at room temperature after pressure returned to atmospheric pressure.
The substrates were incubated with PLE for 48 h at 25 °C in borate buffer and samples were taken at predetermined intervals during the experiment.
Reactions were terminated by adding 5×SDS loading buffer and samples were separated on SDS PAGEs.
Reactions were stopped with SDS sample buffer, and samples were run on a 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel in the dark.
The pellets were eluted in protein loading buffer, and samples were vortexed and boiled for 5 mins at 95°C.
Beads were washed with increasing salt concentration buffers, chromatin eluted by SDS-bicarbonate buffer and samples were decrosslinked at 65°C in presence of high salt concentration.
Similar(24)
Buffers and samples were injected by a nonpulsatile piston pump into the 30 μL flow cell, which was mounted on the coupling prim.
Then, wells were treated with blocking buffer, washed and samples were serially diluted in blocking buffer and incubated 2 hours at 37°C.
The transitions that maintained the same relative intensities in both the buffer and sample were considered as interference free.
Upon 5 washes with lysis buffer sample buffer was added and samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and analysed upon blotting using tag-specific antibodies (Sigma).
Beads were then washed with NETN buffer three times, and samples were boiled with 2× SDS loading buffer, and were analyzed by immunoblot with indicated antibodies.
More suggestions(14)
buffer and stains were
buffer and membranes were
buffer and washes were
buffer and dNTPs were
buffer and supernatants were
buffer and blots were
buffer and immunoprecipitations were
buffer and standards were
buffer and animals were
buffer and NPs were
buffer and solutions were
buffer and cosolutes were
buffer and cells were
buffer and lysates were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com