Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Cells were centrifuged at 600 g for 30 min. The interface containing mononuclear cells was collected and resuspended in 10 ml of staining buffer, washed once, resuspended in staining buffer, and evaluated for cell concentration and viability (trypan blue exclusion) using a hemacytometer.
The bisulfite converted DNA samples were then eluted in 10 μl of elution buffer and evaluated for DNA concentration.
Similar(58)
HBED-CC analogues 3-6 (1.0 nM in HEPES buffer 2.4 mM, 90-100 μL) were radiolabeled with [68Ga]Ga3+ eluate (40 μL, 40-50 MBq), 98°C, 10 min, and evaluated for radiolabeling efficiency via radio-RP-HPLC.
Sampling flow rate, elution flow rate, pH and buffer concentration were evaluated for their importance in the solid-phase extraction using a 24 full factorial design and were all found to be significant.
Other wash buffers were evaluated for on-chip application, including a proprietary EtOH-free wash buffers from Rheonix).
PschSOD suspended in 5 mM K-PO4 buffer, pH 7.2 was evaluated for its stability and activity under long-term storage at 25°C for 180 days.
After the medium was removed, the monolayers were washed with PBS, incubated with 100 μL of PI (Boehringer-Mannheim Mannheim, Germany) in HEPES buffer for 10 15 min and evaluated using fluorescence microscopy as previously described [ 26].
BPD were evaluated for yield and colour using buffer (0, 2, 4% v/v), cassava waste solids (15, 23, 30% w/w), and extraction time (4, 7, 10 min).
Eight hybrid yeast strains were obtained and they were further evaluated for ethanol production in YNB broth containing 6.7 g/L YNB, 150 g/L xylose, and 50 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 and 30°C for 72 h.
100 μL of digestive solution was mixed with 1 mL of Hoechst 33258 dye/buffer, and 200 μL of mixture was evaluated for the excitation at 365 nm and emission at 458 nm by the microplate absorbance reader.
The adaptation time was evaluated for different values of the measurement period and buffer available for queuing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com