budgeted on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "budgeted on" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct phrase would be "budgeted for" when referring to allocating funds for a specific purpose. Example: "The project was budgeted for a total of $50,000 to cover all expenses."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

Small says that in 2008 farmers budgeted on about 15p per litre.

The Guardian - Business

The property costs had been budgeted on the basis of two people's earnings.

The Guardian - Money

The council did not spend £18m as originally budgeted on the operation – the final cost, released last week, was just £7m.

The Guardian

Last year the government spent almost twice what it had budgeted on the scheme.Special report The long climb From Ozzie to Ricky The hamster-wheel A fine balance Separation anxiety Rolling the hoop Gandhian banking Market fatigue Industrial design A dull, heavy calm Sources & acknowledgmentsReprintsIts budgetary battle against joblessness is being repeated the world over.

The Economist

The Showdown promises to be another belter If you'd said a month back that the Showdown would pit 5th against 13th you probably wouldn't have budgeted on the Crows being the better-placed of the two sides, but ladder positioning rarely matters in these encounters anyway.

The Guardian - Sport

San Diego figures to spend more than $3 million more than it budgeted on gasoline.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

Pass a budget on time.

The New York Times

Minnesota enacts budgets on two-year cycles.

The New York Times

There are three budgets on the table.

The New York Times

Budget on €25-€35 for dinner.

The Guardian - Travel

An emergency budget on 22 June.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "budgeted for" instead of "budgeted on" to ensure grammatical correctness. For example, say "The project was "budgeted for" $1 million", not "The project was "budgeted on" $1 million".

Common error

Avoid using "on" after "budgeted". The correct preposition is "for" when allocating funds for a specific purpose. Using "budgeted on" can make your writing appear unprofessional and confuse readers.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "budgeted on" is generally used as a verb phrase where "budgeted" acts as a verb in the past tense or past participle form, attempting to describe the act of allocating funds. However, as Ludwig AI points out, the correct preposition to use in this context is "for," not "on."

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "budgeted on" appears in some contexts, it is considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI confirms that the correct preposition to use is "for" when referring to the allocation of funds. Therefore, it is advisable to always use "budgeted for" to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy. Alternatives such as "allocated to" or "earmarked for" may also be suitable depending on the context. The examples available through Ludwig demonstrate that while the intent is often clear, the execution is flawed from a grammatical standpoint.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

budgeted for

This is the correct idiomatic preposition to use with "budgeted" when referring to allocating funds.

allocated to

This phrase suggests a formal distribution of resources to a specific purpose.

earmarked for

This implies setting aside resources for a particular project or expense.

planned for

This is a broader term that indicates resources were considered in advance.

designated for

This indicates a formal assignment of funds for a specific use.

set aside for

This emphasizes the act of reserving resources from general use.

accounted for

This suggests resources have been considered in financial planning.

estimated for

Focuses on the anticipation of costs within a financial plan.

factored into the budget

This phrase emphasizes the inclusion of something within the overall budget.

resources allocated

A more general phrase referencing the assignment of resources, without explicitly stating a budget.

FAQs

How should I correctly use the term "budgeted" in a sentence?

The correct phrasing is "budgeted for" when you're allocating funds or resources. For example, "The department "budgeted for" new equipment this year".

Is it ever appropriate to use "budgeted on"?

No, "budgeted on" is not considered standard English. The correct preposition to use with "budgeted" when referring to financial planning is "for". Using "budgeted on" is grammatically incorrect.

What are some alternatives to saying "budgeted for"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "allocated to", "earmarked for", or "planned for" instead of ""budgeted for"".

What is the difference between "budgeted for" and "allocated to"?

"Budgeted for" specifically refers to including an amount in a budget, while "allocated to" means to officially assign something for a particular purpose. They can be used interchangeably in some contexts, but "allocated to" has a broader meaning.