Sentence examples for budgetary impact analysis from inspiring English sources

We modelled a budgetary impact analysis (BIA) to estimate the impact of the SNHS funding drug-based therapies for smoking cessation in smokers with MDD.

There are also important methodological differences, one of which is the use of budgetary impact analysis.

Although pharmaceutical spending is likely to rise faster than other ADHD-related expenditures, it is certainly not the only cost component to be considered in a complete budgetary impact analysis [ 30, 66].

The combination of budgetary allocations combined with impact analysis will provide decision-makers in the public and private sector on the real progress being made in achieving the Year 2000 and CRC goals in Jamaica (cost efficiency and the quality of service delivery).

This budgetary impact projection represents a partial analysis only because other expenditures are likely to rise as well, for instance those associated with physician services, including diagnosis and psychosocial treatment.

(Of course, as adult patients with ADHD have not been included in this analysis, the total budgetary impact of ADHD may be greater for those specialists who also treat adults, for example parents of patients).

To provide policymakers with more practical budgetary information, we conducted a budget impact analysis over a 10-year time horizon (2010-2019) from the perspective of budget holders (i.e., local governments) [ 34, 35] by extending the base-case analysis using the same Excel-based model.

Congress already asks for a budgetary impact report called "CBO scoring," referring to analysis by the Congressional Budget Office to show whether and how much any given proposal will cost in tax dollars.

In addition, they challenge the notion that ignoring cost effectiveness analysis is justifiable if the budgetary impact is small, but also note that while expenditures for individual orphan drugs may be a small part of the health budget, collectively they could represent a much larger share.

Adding to this irresponsible picture, Republicans are poised to mark up their bill without a full analysis from the Congressional Budget Office of its budgetary impact or — crucially — of how many people the proposal would (or would not) cover.

Since the perspective of a health insurance fund was used in this analysis, co-payments are not relevant, as they do not have a budgetary impact.