Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
"How about $30?" Fifteen bucks below face value, for Game 1. Hey, they're trying.
At $799, it's not cheap, but it's a couple hundred bucks below the latest from Apple and Samsung.
Citing "current market conditions," Home Depot altered its modified Dutch auction tender offer, by limiting the bidding range to $37 and $42 a share, two bucks below the initial range of $39 to $44 a share.
On Thursday, the company altered its modified Dutch auction tender offer, by limiting the bidding range to $37 and $42 a share, two bucks below the initial range of $39 to $44 a share.
Earlier this month, the company lowered its repurchase program, citing current market conditions. Home Depot altered its modified Dutch auction tender offer, by limiting the bidding range to $37 and $42 a share, two bucks below the initial range of $39 to $44 a share.
Similar(55)
9 30 A.M. (Showtime 2) BUCK (2011) Buck Brannaman, below right — a former trick-rope performer who, after overcoming a childhood of abuse, became an inspiration for the novel and movie "The Horse Whisperer" — tames willful beasts, and occasionally their owners, in this documentary by Cindy Meehl.
Eighty bucks is below book value where you pull triggers and buy stocks.
We climbed aboard a Zodiac suspended alongside the ship on a device that looked suspiciously like a rope swing, and were slowly lowered into the bucking waves below.
In 2008, one fund, Reserve Primary, "broke the buck," falling below the $1-a-share asset value that money market funds have traditionally maintained.
On Sept. 16, 2008, it reported that the net asset value of its Reserve Primary fund had "broken the buck," falling below $1 a share.
When one of Mr Bent's own funds "broke the buck", falling below the $1 net asset value (NAV) that is sacrosanct to the individuals, companies and local governments that park their cash in such places, a run on the industry ensued.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com